The Golden X Inn Ought to Offer a Women's Washroom

This is not a case against gender-neutral washrooms. This is a case for acknowledging that women’s safety is an ongoing concern, especially in a context where alcohol is served, and it is problematic for the campus bar to only offer an all-gender stalled washroom.

For context, The Golden X Inn (the campus bar) has been undergoing renovations for about eight months and is on track to re-open at the beginning of the Spring Semester. At the grand reopening, patrons can anticipate a new stage, an updated bar, and oh, one all-gender washroom. These are not single-stalled washrooms, as people might recognize from the off-campus bar Candid. It will be one room, lined with stalls, intended for all genders to use alongside each other.

Students may have noticed gender-neutral washrooms beginning to appear around campus. In all academic buildings in which they are offered, gender-neutral washrooms can be regarded as a third option, existing alongside segregated washrooms. Beyond the case of a few residences, there is no real precedent for a building offering gender-neutral bathrooms exclusively. I cannot understand why the school would start with the campus bar as their first experiment amalgamating the men's and women’s washrooms. According to the National Sexual Violence Research Center, approximately 75% of rape victims are intoxicated. This is not to misplace blame onto sexual assault victims, but StFX students surely understand that alcohol has a debilitating effect. People are vulnerable when they are drunk, and our bar is, thereby, inherently one of the least safe spaces on campus for women.

Furthermore, female washrooms can play a defensive role in the context of a bar. As the joke goes, women go to the bathroom in groups. This is partly because the women’s bathroom is a room where men cannot acceptably follow them. If you want to check in on your friend and make sure they’re comfortable, you can suggest that the two of you go to the bathroom together as a means to easily pull them aside and talk to them in private. And if you yourself wanted to get away from a persistent man, the women’s bathroom provides a perfect excuse to get away and “hide,” so to speak. The goal of this article is not to try to exclude transgender or nonbinary people from women’s washrooms, but to emphasize that they are men-free zones, and this separation is necessary for women’s safety.

I also want to point out that sexual violence resources were formerly posted on the back of the women’s washroom stall doors in the Inn. These resources should really be made visible to everyone, regardless of gender, but I want to call attention to one poster specifically. The women’s washroom used to advertise a made-up drink that women could “order” to discretely indicate that they needed help. Anonymity when getting someone kicked out of a bar is critical at a small school like StFX because you don’t want to risk angering someone when they likely know who you are. With the elimination of the female washroom, this resource loses its discretion and unique appeal.

Perhaps it seems dramatic to say that the merging of the men's and women’s washrooms poses a threat to women. But just last February, two women were assaulted in a female washroom at the Queen’s University Library. And that’s a library. Bathrooms are surveillance blind spots, as you can’t even have a security camera facing the door. I would also add that Inn staff are being asked to be extra vigilant to compensate for this remodel, and an onus is being unfairly placed on the Inn security’s shoulders, who are students themselves. I don’t understand the rationale behind making an already vulnerable space even more so. Why is the female bathroom being rendered more dangerous at one of the most dangerous places for a woman on campus? If this were indeed something students were asking for, wouldn’t we see stalled gendered washrooms being phased out across campus, not just the campus bar?

By using the idea that all-gender bathrooms promote inclusivity, the Students’ Union misplaces blame and fosters resentment towards the LGBTQ+ community. I, for one, cannot remember X-Pride campaigning for the opening of an all-gender bathroom in the Inn, or at the very least, in the way it has been designed. Frankly, I think that claiming that this bathroom meets the demands of LGBTQ+ is an excuse. People are upset by this design choice, and the Students’ Union is implicitly misdirecting blame towards LGBTQ+ students by saying that their decision was motivated by a desire to promote inclusivity. A petition has been circulating on Change.Org since August 31st, and has amassed 208 signatures. During their staff training, Inn staff were told that combining the men and women’s bathroom was necessary to install enough stalls for the increased capacity that the renovations allow for. I would say that saving money is the real reason the Inn is reopening without a female washroom and using the cover of “inclusivity” is unfair to LGBTQ+ students.

The Inn ought to offer a women's washroom because they ought to offer a space in a bar that promotes women’s safety instead of undermining it. I am personally insulted that women’s safety is being disregarded and seems to be of such little importance to the Students’ Union. Even if my concern is exaggerated or overblown, I think it is an undeniable fact the elimination of the women’s washroom endangers women to some extent. The Students’ Union should never do anything that increases the likelihood of sexual assault. Perhaps this idea will run smoothly for this year or even the next few, but I fear that a women’s washroom will only be reimplemented after something disastrous happens. The fact that this is the Students’ Union’s chosen course of action disgusts me.